John durant what is scientific literacy




















I feel that animation fits into two experiences and outcomes for Technology in Curriculum for Excellence. These are:. The findings can then be shared so it becomes more than reflection or personal enquiry.

I believe that an enquiring practitioner is someone who is willing to reflect upon their work and the work of others in order to develop their skills and to benefit others. An enquiring practitioner is about being open minded to try new things; being adaptive — understanding that some things might not work and being able to change that from your own knowledge or from the knowledge of someone else and, having the ability to be critical of themselves and their own work as well as the work of others GTCS.

It should also be about life-long learning and the willingness to develop your teaching skills as time goes on. I also believe that an enquiring practitioner is someone who has a desire to increase their knowledge and skills, for example, a lesson may not have gone as planned in the sense that a large proportion of the class has not been able to grasp the topic. Some benefits of being an enquiring practitioner have been noted on the GTCS website.

These include:. There can also be negatives to this some of these are noted on GTCS website :. For me as a student teacher, I believe that this means I should be open to trying new things and open to advice, even right now in my first year of university.

I also believe that this means having the ability to recognise that not everything you try will work and to persevere as you will get there in the end. I think it is about working on the advice given to me which will improve my knowledge and skills. It also means recognising that learning never stops and we can all work together in order to improve ourselves.

I think this will be especially important when on placement as the teacher is already qualified and they can help and advise you from their own experiences at university and during their teaching career. From watching the video I have been able to draw some conclusions about the aspects of teachers that make a difference. A teacher who makes a difference should be avidly involved in team work and should be willing to share information with others — the video mentioned a new curriculum one teacher discovered and she decided it was a great idea to share this with others, because of this they were able to upgrade their teaching degrees through workshops to include this new curriculum.

In addition to this, a teacher who makes a difference should be willing to learn all the time and not just stop learning when they have obtained their degree. This links in with being aware of what is happening, so keeping up to date with methods of teaching and resources used for learning — which could include technological advances; I think these all show commitment and love of the work they undertake.

Finally, a teacher who makes a difference should be dedicated, should discipline at the correct moments, they should be willing to make some sacrifices for the benefit of their pupils and they should definitely go home at the end of every day with a sense of satisfaction knowing that they have done the best they possibly could have for their pupils and that their pupils have increased their knowledge because of the work they have done..

Students view of what makes a perfect teacher. I do agree with what these teachers call professionalism. The teachers talked about how teachers are becoming more accountable for their actions like other professions, for example a doctor. A doctor is accountable for their actions when treating patients and this is the same for teachers — they are accountable for their actions when educating and beyond.

They also described how teachers are seen as role models and should have an appropriate attitude. They also said that a professional should be mindful of how they react to the way others speak to them, therefore not judging someone just because of their background.

A professional should be an effective communicator and be able to communicate efficiently with all people of all ages. One teacher said in order for teachers to be professional they should keep up with their professional development by increasing their teaching and learning standards and they should be able to cater for the needs of their students in the class very, very well. I do agree with what the teachers say about professionalism and it is evident that being a teacher is being part of a profession.

The message I receive from Chris Christie is that teachers are a very highly valued part of society. They go above and beyond for every student and show care and compassion. Chris also said that teachers should be paid what they deserve to be paid and more, however, I think most teachers are in this profession for many other things other than the pay they receive — satisfaction of seeing a pupil understand their work, watching the pupils grow and develop through time, knowing that you have given your students the time, the care, the support, the understanding to help them with their future.

Public Understanding of Science, 9 3 , Boston University. Health Literacy Tool Shed. Boston, MA: Boston University. Braman, D. Geoengineering and the science communication environment: A cross-cultural experiment. Brossard, D. New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Suppl.

Deference to scientific authority among a low-information public: Understanding U. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19 1 , Science, new media, and the public. Science, 33 , Do they know what they read? Building a scientific literacy measurement instrument based on science media coverage. Science Communication, 28 1 , Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project.

International Journal of Science Education, 27 9 , Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18 5 , Brown, P.

Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: Lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33 3 , When the public knows better: Popular epidemiology challenges the system. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 35 8 , Brulle, R.

Environmental justice: Human health and environmental inequalities. Annual Review of Public Health, 27 , Bucchi, M. Science and public participation. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman Eds. Bybee, R. PISA An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 8 , Cacciatore, M.

From enabling technology to applications: The evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 20 3 , Public attitudes toward biofuels: Effects of knowledge, political partisanship, and media use.

Politics and the Life Sciences, 31 , Labeling renewable energies: How the language surrounding biofuels can influence its public acceptance. Energy Policy, 51 , Campbell, D. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Campbell, F. The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: A comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations.

Patient Education and Counselling, 53 2 , Carl, N. Scientific literacy, optimism about science and conservatism.

Personality and Individual Differences, 94 , Carnoy, M. Student Performance? Cashman, S. The power and the promise: Working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 98 8 , Center on Education Policy. Chin, M. Interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare.

Medical Care Research and Review, 64 Suppl. China Research Institute for Science Popularization. Clapp, R. Popular epidemiology in three contaminated communities. Coben D. Numeracy, mathematics and adult learning. Gal Ed. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Cohn, J.

Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58 3 , Conrad, C. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, , Cooper-Robbins, S. Health Psychology, 29 6 , Corburn, J. Community knowledge in environmental health science: Co-producing policy expertise. Cossons, N. Let us take science into our culture. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 18 4 , Council of Canadian Academies.

Ottawa, Canada: Council of Canadian Academies. Crowell, A. Unpacking the relationship between science education and applied scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 46 1 , Dainton, F. Davis, I. The measurement of scientific attitudes. Science Education, 19 3 , Davis, R. Davis, T.

Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: A shortened screening instrument. Family Medicine, 25 6 , Low literacy impairs comprehension of prescription drug warning labels. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21 8 , Dawson, E. Science Education, 98 6 , DeBoer, G. Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 37 6 , Delgado, R. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. Delli Carpini, M. Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7 , DeVellis, R. Scale Development: Theory and Applications 2nd ed.

DeWalt, D. Health literacy and child health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Pediatrics, 3 , SS Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19 12 , A heart failure self-management program for patients of all literacy levels: A randomized, controlled trial.

Literacy and its relationship with self-efficacy, trust, and participation in medical decision making. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31 Suppl.

Dewey, J. New York: Holt. The supreme intellectual obligation. Science Education, 18 1 , Doble, J. Public opinion about issues characterized by technological complexity and scientific uncertainty. Public Understanding of Science, 4 2 , Drew, J. Use of traditional ecological knowledge in marine conservation.

Conservation Biology, 19 4 , Druckman, J. Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. Journal of Communication, 61 4 , Drummond, C. Development and validation of the scientific reasoning scale. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , e1-e Dudo, A. Science on television in the 21st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research, 38 6 , Dunn, A.

Associations between exposure to and expression of negative opinions about human papillomavirus vaccines on social media: An observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17 6 , e Durant, J. The public understanding of science. Two cultures of public understanding of science. Dierkes and C. Grote Eds. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic. Einsiedel, E. Consensus conferences as deliberative democracy: A communications perspective.

Science Communication, 21 4 , Ellis, J. International Journal of Family Medicine, 1 Art. Epstein, S. The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials.

Berkeley: University of California Press. Patient groups and health movements. European Commission. White Paper on Education and Training. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. European Opinions on Modern Biotechnology: Eurobarometer Evans, C.

The neighborhood nest-watch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19 3 , Evans, G. The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4 1 , Feinstein, N. Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95 1 , Outside the pipeline: Reimagining science education for nonscientists.

Feldman, L. Using policitcal efficacy messages to increase climate activism: The mediating role of emotions. Science Communication, 38 1 , Fessenden-Raden, J. Providing risk information in communities: Factors influencing what is heard and accepted. Finger, M. From knowledge to action? Exploring the relationships between environmental experiences, learning, and behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 50 3 , Fiske, S.

Social Cognition 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Fourez, G. Scientific and technological literacy as social practice. Social Studies of Science, 27 6 , Frank, M. Project Science for all Americans. The Physiologist, 32 5 , Frickel, S. Undone science: Charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting. The organization of expert activism: Shadow mobilization in two social movements.

Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20 3 , Fung, T. Energy Policy, 73 , Funk, C. Funtowicz, S. Science for the Post Normal Age. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Gabel, L. Columbus: Ohio State University. Gaskell, G. Europeans and Biotechnology in Brussels, Belgium: Europa. GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 24 1 , Gastil, J. Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation.

Political Communication, 16 1 , Gauchat, G. Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, to American Sociological Review, 77 2 , The political context of science in the United States: Public acceptance of evidence-based policy and science funding. Social Forces, 94 2 , Ginsburg, L. The Components of Numeracy, Occasional Paper.

Glanz, K. Goidel, K. Exploring the roots of public participation in the controversy over embryonic stem cell research and cloning. Political Behavior, 28 2 , Golbeck, A.

A definition and operational framework for health numeracy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29 4 , Goldacre, B.

Bad science: How to put your relationship to the universe into a seasonal perspective. The Guardian, December Bad Science. London: Harper Collins. Goldman, S. Adolescent literacy: Development and instruction. Pollatsek and R.

Treiman Eds. New York: Oxford University Press. Goodman, M. Department of Education. Gore, P. Predictors of childhood immunization completion in a rural population. Greenberg, M. Communicating to an alarmed community about cancer clusters: A fifty state study.

Journal of Community Health, 16 2 , Gunther, A. Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 56 3 , Guy, S. Investigating the effects of knowledge and ideology on climate change beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44 5 , Hanushek, E. Knowledge capital, growth, and the East Asian miracle. Hargreaves, I. Science, Society, and the Media.

Harrison, J. Society and Natural Resources, 24 7 , Hart, P. Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39 , Public attention to science and political news and support for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 5 , Haun, J. Health literacy measurement: An inventory and descriptive summary of 51 instruments.

Journal of Health Communication, 19 Suppl. Hawthorne, G. Preteenage drug use in Australia: The key predictors and school-based drug education.

Journal of Adolescent Health, 20 5 , Henderson, B. Beyond construction: Five arguments for the role of critique in teaching science. International Journal of Science Education, 37 10 , Hess, D. Science, technology, and social movements. Hines, J. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18 2 , Hirsch, E. Hirst, P. Liberal education and the nature of knowledge.

Philosophical Analysis and Education, 2 , The Logic of Education. London: Routledge. Ho, S. Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20 2 , Making sense of policy choices: Understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology.

Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 12 8 , Factors influencing public risk-benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing.

Public Understanding of Science, 22 5 , Hsu, S. The effects of an environmental education program on responsible environmental behavior and associated environmental literacy variables in Taiwanese college students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35 2 , Huntington, H. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: Methods and applications. Ecological Applications, 10 5 , You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Reprints and Permissions.

Durant, J. The public understanding of science. Nature , 11—14 Download citation. Issue Date : 06 July Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:.

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Cultural Studies of Science Education International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Nature Human Behaviour Behavior Genetics Advanced search.

Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000